Sustainable Reduction in Administrative Costs in Social Protection Systems Through Digitalization and AI-Driven Process Automation

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/su18126351
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Efficient and financially sustainable social protection systems are essential under conditions of economic instability and increasing social demand. However, traditional administrative models are often characterized by high operational costs, procedural complexity, and delayed benefit delivery. This study examines the role of digitalization, process automation, and AI-driven administrative solutions in reducing administrative expenses while enhancing the sustainability and resilience of social protection systems. An integrated Automation Index is developed using standardized proxy indicators that reflect reductions in operational and transaction costs associated with digital and automated technologies. To assess future trajectories of administrative expenses, scenario-based modelling is applied under three digital transformation paths—baseline, moderate, and intensive. Administrative efficiency is estimated using a translog Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) framework. The results indicate that digitalization and automation significantly reduce administrative costs only when supported by favorable institutional conditions, including decentralized governance, effective inter-agency coordination, and clearly regulated administrative procedures. Under the intensive digital transformation scenario, administrative expenses decline substantially relative to the baseline, while system responsiveness and beneficiary coverage improve. In contrast, weak institutional environments limit the efficiency gains of technological solutions. The study concludes that AI agents and automated systems should be viewed not as substitutes for human decision-making but as tools for optimizing administrative architectures. This transition from resource-intensive to technology-intensive models is particularly important for developing countries seeking sustainable social protection under constrained fiscal conditions.