Analysis of the Main Technical and Economic Indicators of Hydraulic Rock Drills for Drilling Hard Rocks in Relation to the Mining Industry of Kazakhstan

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52209/1609-1825_2026_2_51
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article provides an overview of hydraulic rock drill models based on an analysis of their technical characteristics, applications, service life, cost, and other characteristics. To evaluate the technical and economic indicators, leading manufacturers of hydraulic rock drills were selected: Epiroc, Sandvik, Doofor, Montabert, Furukawa, Woserld, Everdigm, Klemm, most of which have representative offices in Kazakhstan. For comparison, the energy parameters of hydraulic rock drills are selected, including impact energy and frequency, power, pressure and fluid flow rate, application area, and cost. The advantages and disadvantages of hydraulic rock drills which offered by manufacturers are discussed. Special attention is given to hydraulic rock drills from Chinese manufacturers currently available on the market. Recommendations for selecting hydraulic rock drills are also provided