Counteracting fake news as a factor in the development of professional competencies of future journalism students

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.11591/ijere.v15i3.35661
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of training in countering fake news on the development of professional competencies among journalism students. This research provides a structured pedagogical framework for teaching fact-checking and critical thinking. Using a quasi-experimental design at Toraighyrov University (n=190), the study compared an experimental group (EG) with a control group (CG) across three phases: diagnostic, instructional, and evaluative. Results from the 2024 final testing demonstrate significant efficacy: the EG showed a 64% increase in critical thinking, news analysis, fact-checking, vastly outperforming the 11% growth in the CG. Qualitative data further confirmed a marked reduction in trust toward unverified sources. These findings offer a scalable model for journalism education, proving that targeted instructional interventions are highly effective for developing professional competencies in media content evaluation.