Impact of a university–school collaboration model on pre-service teacher leadership development

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.11591/ijere.v15i3.39143
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of an innovative university–school collaboration model on leadership development (LD), operationalized through leadership competencies (LCs), among pre-service teachers (PTs) enrolled in teacher education programs (TEPs), and to explore the relationship between LCs and teaching self-efficacy. Specifically, the study investigated whether participation in the university–school collaboration model led to statistically significant improvements in key LCs within the Kazakhstani teacher education context. A quantitative quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group design was employed, involving 120 PTs from Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University in Almaty, Kazakhstan. The findings indicate that participation in the university–school collaboration model was associated with significant improvements in LCs across multiple dimensions. In addition, strong positive relationships were observed between LCs and teaching self-efficacy, suggesting that leadership-oriented learning experiences support broader aspects of professional confidence among PTs. No subject-specific differences in LD outcomes were identified, indicating the discipline-general applicability of the model. Overall, the study provides empirical evidence supporting multidimensional LD through structured university–school collaboration. The findings extend existing research on teacher leadership and offer practical guidance for designing scalable, experiential leadership components within initial TEPs.