Invisible Authors, Visible Gender: How Readers Infer Author Gender from Fiction

Open Cultural Studies, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1515/culture-2025-0103
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract This article examines how gender shapes readers’ perceptions of literary authorship when biographical information is withheld. Using an explanatory mixed-methods design, it investigates how male and female university students infer an author’s gender from short prose excerpts and which cues guide these inferences. Data come from 83 undergraduates (62 women, 21 men) at Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, who completed a questionnaire containing seven anonymised excerpts from Kazakh and World prose fiction by three female and four male authors. For each excerpt, participants indicated whether they believed the author to be male or female and provided open-ended justifications. Quantitative analysis (error rates and chi-square tests) shows that both female and male readers identified male authors more accurately than female authors. Although female readers displayed a modest advantage, misclassification of female-authored texts remained frequent in both groups, indicating a shared tendency to assume male authorship. Qualitative thematic analysis of the justifications reveals reliance on strongly gendered markers and stereotypes: male authors were associated with strength, rationality, history and power, whereas female authors were linked to emotionality, vulnerability and relational or domestic roles. The study provides empirical evidence on the gendered reception of literary texts.