Blended learning in school mathematics with digital tools to enhance student understanding

Discover Education, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1007/s44217-026-01685-6
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The study examines the impact of blended learning in school mathematics, with a focus on digital enhancements to traditional instruction. As part of the pedagogical experiment, which lasted 8 weeks, 80 students of the tenth grade from three schools in Kyrgyzstan were randomly divided into control and experimental groups. A mixed-methods design was used, combined a pedagogical experiment, comparative analysis, and a supplementary questionnaire survey. Digital platforms (Wolfram Alpha, Photomath, GeoGebra, Desmos, and Compass) were integrated into the experimental group’s curriculum, while the control group used only conventional methods. Comparative analysis of post-test results using the Mastery Coefficient ( K ) revealed a statistically significant advantage for the EG: the EG improved from K = 0.85 to K = 0.96 (Δ K = +0.11), nearly three times the gain observed in the CG ( K = 0.82 to K = 0.86; Δ K = +0.04). The difference in score distributions following the intervention was confirmed as statistically significant \(\left( {X_{emp}^{2} > X_{crit}^{2} ,X_{crit}^{2} = 7.815,\quad p < 0.05} \right)\) , with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.9). The study’s novelty lies in providing empirical evidence for digitally enhanced mathematics instruction in Central Asia, a context where such models remain largely untested.