TyG–BMI as a Marker of Metabolic Status and Its Association with Bone Quality and Mineral Metabolism: A Sex-Specific Analysis

Assel Anarbayeva, Karlygash Zharylkasynovna Sadykova, Gulnaz Orazbekovna Nuskabayeva, Nursultan Seisenbaiuly Nurdinov, Nurgul Zholdassova, Dilfuza Narzullaevna Mamraimova, Gulzira Baimakhanova, Dinara Azizkhojayeva, Sirozhiddin Irismetov, Shoira Isanova

1 more author

U.B. Tatykayeva

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/jcm15114226
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Background: Insulin resistance (IR) is a major pathogenic factor in metabolic syndrome and related diseases. It is challenging to accurately measure IR due to high cost and technical complexity. TyG-derived indices have been proposed as simple and reliable surrogates for assessing insulin resistance. The present study aimed to investigate the association between TyG-derived indices and indicators of mineral metabolism and bone quality and to examine sex-specific differences. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 330 adults aged 18–65 years. Age-adjusted partial correlation analyses and multivariable linear regression models were performed to examine the associations between TyG indices and several metabolic parameters, minerals, and QUS bone indices. Results: TyG–BMI was strongly correlated with triglycerides (females: r = 0.51; males: r = 0.54, both p < 0.001), glucose (females: r = 0.54, p < 0.001), and hip circumference (females: r = 0.77; males: r = 0.58, both p < 0.001). HDL showed inverse associations (females: r = −0.41, p < 0.001). In females, TyG–BMI demonstrated modest positive correlations with bone parameters, including BQI (r = 0.21, p = 0.002), T-score and Z-score (r = 0.21, p = 0.002 for both), SOS (r = 0.19, p = 0.007), and BUA (r = 0.18, p = 0.010), whereas no significant associations were observed in males. In multivariable models, TyG–BMI in females remained independently associated with glucose (β = 9.77, p < 0.001), waist circumference (β = 2.94, p < 0.001), and HDL (β = −26.6, p < 0.001), but not with mineral or bone parameters. Conclusions: The TyG-derived indices, most notably TyG–BMI, are useful indicators of metabolic status that correlate with bone quality yet exhibit sex-specific associations. These findings support the role of TyG-derived indices as accessible surrogate markers of metabolic status and demonstrate sex-specific associations with bone quality parameters.