Structural barriers to university counselling and ChatGPT as a preferred help-seeking alternative: a convergent mixed-methods study among Generation Z students in Kazakhstan

Frontiers in Education, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3389/feduc.2026.1838533
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Background Student psychological well-being is increasingly threatened by academic competition, information overload, and socio-economic pressures, yet university counselling services in Kazakhstan remain underutilized due to structural and cultural barriers. Methods A convergent mixed-methods design was employed: a quantitative survey of 328 first-year students at Astana IT University (response rate 72.9%) and in-depth semi-structured interviews with 103 participants. Transcripts were analyzed using codebook thematic analysis with NVivo 14; inter-coder consistency reached κ = 0.82. Results Among non-users of counselling services, 70.1% stated a preference for ChatGPT as an alternative to professional psychological counselling. Key barriers included difficulty scheduling appointments (84.8%), confidentiality concerns (73.0%), and low trust in specialist competence (62.3%). A critical divergence was identified: Kazakh-speaking students rated resilience higher quantitatively yet reported embarrassment discussing psychological problems in interviews-interpreted as culturally mediated underreporting of distress. Discussion The findings reveal a systemic awareness-utilization gap and document a preference-driven displacement pattern toward AI tools in a context of limited institutional access. Five evidence-informed policy recommendations are proposed, including development of a national professional standard for university psychologists and integration of culturally adapted digital mental health platforms.