White-box modeling of asphaltene precipitation during natural depletion of oil reservoirs

Scientific Reports, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1038/s41598-026-55015-9
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Asphaltene precipitation and deposition pose significant challenges in the oil industry, leading to well blockage, formation damage, impairment of process equipment, and reduced reservoir permeability, which ultimately affect oil production and economic efficiency. Traditional laboratory-based methods for detecting asphaltene precipitation are often costly and time-consuming, emphasizing the need for rapid and reliable predictive techniques. This study develops predictive models for asphaltene precipitation using three white-box machine learning algorithms: Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH), Gene Expression Programming (GEP), and Genetic Programming (GP). The models were trained and validated based on a dataset of 308 laboratory measurements from 25 types of crude oils, considering relevant parameters influencing model performance. Their predictive capability was benchmarked against a thermodynamically consistent cubic-plus-association (CPA) equation of state developed in this work. Statistical evaluations confirmed the reliability of the developed models. Among the correlations, GMDH demonstrated the best performance, achieving the correlation coefficient (R 2 ) of 0.858 and a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.171. GMDH delivers quick forecasts for new cases without requiring further tuning, while still accurately predicting asphaltene precipitation. Sensitivity analysis revealed that pressure (P), oil °API gravity (°API), and bubble point pressure (P b ) exhibit the strongest negative correlations with asphaltene precipitation, indicating that the highest risk occurs during P drops near the P b and in heavier crude oils with lower °API values. Finally, Leverage-based outlier analysis confirmed the reliability of the dataset, with 97.080% of data points within the valid region, reinforcing the credibility of both experimental measurements and predictive models.