Comparative analysis of health indicators in relation to sports activities among student youth in Kazakhstan

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.47197/retos.v81.118820
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Introduction: the study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a physical activity program in terms of its impact on the health of participants. Objective: to achieve this goal, an integrated approach combining quantitative methods of assessment is employed. Methodology A total of 150 participants were divided into three groups: Group 1 (n=37) followed a standard exercise program with general workouts twice weekly and lifestyle education; Group 2 (n=38) participated in an extended program with individual training sessions three times weekly, combining cardio, strength, and flexibility exercises, alongside personalized dietary and lifestyle advice; the control group (n=75) maintained their usual routines. Results: The results indicated that Group 2 experienced the most significant improvements in health markers. The study’s findings support the efficacy of tailored training programs that incorporate frequent and diverse physical activity. Discussion: Participants in Group 2, who received the extended program, demonstrated more significant improvements than those in other groups, emphasizing the significance of a comprehensive approach to physical activity and healthy lifestyles. Conclusions: It is advised to include such personalized interventions into public health initiatives to achieve better outcomes in disease prevention and treatment.