Dynamic headway control for capacity optimization: a critical review

Frontiers in Future Transportation, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3389/ffutr.2026.1826998
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Increasing traffic density and the deployment of digital signalling technologies are transforming railway capacity from a static infrastructure constraint into a real-time controllable system-performance variable. This critical review provides a system-level analysis of dynamic headway control and its impact on effective railway capacity within closed-loop operational environments. Modelling paradigms, including analytical methods, microscopic simulation, optimisation-based traffic management, and artificial intelligence approaches, are comparatively assessed with respect to control capability, scalability, real-time applicability, and sensitivity to disturbances. The review shows that conventional planning-oriented capacity assessment systematically overestimates achievable throughput because it neglects traffic stability, disturbance propagation, and feedback-based regulation. The evolution of control architectures from fixed-block signalling to moving-block systems, predictive traffic management, and virtual coupling is interpreted as a transition from infrastructure-limited to control-limited capacity. A unified conceptual framework is proposed that links control architecture, headway dynamics, traffic stability, and effective capacity within a cyber-physical control loop. This perspective enables the identification of key research gaps, including the lack of integrated real-time models and the limited incorporation of artificial intelligence into safety-critical control. Future intelligent railway operation is expected to be based on digital twins, reinforcement learning, and distributed coordination, enabling continuous capacity regulation under stochastic conditions.