INTEGRATION OF THE WORDWALL SERVICE INTO THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS: WAYS TO IMPROVE STUDENTS' GRAMMAR, VOCABULARY AND ORAL SPEECH

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.47649/vau.26.v80.i1.23
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Digital platforms have become firmly embedded in the practice of School No. 7 in Uralsk, yet rigorous comparative evidence on their impact on adolescents’ language learning outcomes remains limited. The aim of the study is to experimentally assess the impact of using the Wordwall digital platform in the format of short interactive microsessions on the formation of grammatical and lexical skills, as well as the development of oral speech in eighth grade students, followed by justification of the effectiveness of integrating digital tools into the educational process based on a comparative analysis of the results of experimental and control groups. This article presents a quasiexperimental study examining the effects of short interactive Wordwall micro-sessions on eighth-grade students’ mastery of grammar and vocabulary and the development of speaking skills. Fifty students (experimental group, EG = 25; control group, CG = 25) participated over six weeks (four weeks of instruction plus a delayed retention check two weeks later); both groups followed the same syllabus, while the experimental group systematically used Wordwall activities 3 times, 8–12 minutes per week. Assessment included pre-, post-, and delayed (retention) tests; speaking was rated using the CAF rubric (complexity, accuracy, fluency). By median Post–Pre gains, the experimental group outperformed the control: grammar—gain of +14 points (Post–Pre) versus +9 (out of 100); vocabulary—gain of +9 (out of 40) versus +6; speaking—gain of +5.0 (out of 30) versus +3.5. The share of students who surpassed the predefined thresholds for meaningful progress was also higher in the EG (grammar: 76% vs. 40%; vocabulary: 72% vs. 44%; speaking: 64% vs. 36%). The paper discusses mechanisms of action (retrieval practice, gamification, ICAP), design limitations, and practical recommendations for integrating Wordwall into lessons.