Global assessment of wildlife cryopreservation reveals major taxonomic gaps and strong species-specific differences in mammalian sperm cryotolerance

2026

Full text Open access: Green Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.64898/2026.05.22.727075
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract Currently, global conservation efforts for wildlife focus on a limited number of cell types and species. Although protocols from domestic and non-threatened related species have been applied to endangered species, cryopreservation techniques are species-specific and are constrained by a lack of understanding of reproductive biology in these species. Based on a review of 126 original studies from 27 countries, encompassing 160 species, we assess the current state of cryopreservation in wildlife, including gametes, embryos, somatic cells, and various tissues. Furthermore, we focused on the most homogeneous and frequently studied cell type in wildlife cryobanking: mammals sperm.. A meta-analysis of 27 studies was conducted to examine species-specific and protocol-dependent factors that affect post-thaw sperm quality. Our findings provide quantitative estimates of cryopreservation for various cell types and tissues in wildlife taxa. Furthermore, they serve as a crucial research roadmap, identifying major challenges in cryopreservation and proposing solutions.