Social Intelligence in the Context of Students’ Educational-Professional Activities

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0055.7693
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The study investigates the level of expression, interrelations, and statistically significant differences in social intelligence within the context of students’ educational and professional activities. The sample consisted of second- and third‑year university students representing various fields of study in Kazakhstan Universities. A set of psychodiagnostic instruments adapted and validated for the Kazakhstani population was applied. Average indicators of learning styles and thinking styles were obtained. In terms of social intelligence, students are encouraged to strengthen their competence in verbal expression and to develop logical reasoning that supports effective behavioural responses. These competencies were shown to be associated with creativity and the prognostic aspects of thinking. Significant male advantages were identified in four areas: (1) practical learning style, (2) ability to solve tasks based on behavioural story completion, (3) ability to solve tasks requiring logical completion of behavioural sequences, and (4) analytic thinking style. Significant female advantages were observed in three areas: (1) activist learning style, (1) competence in verbal expression, and (3) realist thinking style. Among learning styles, the activist style demonstrated the highest dependence on external factors, whereas the reflector and pragmatist styles appeared the most autonomous. The findings support the view that social intelligence, within educational and professional activities, reflects students’ ability to understand others, interact effectively in the learning environment, and solve cognitive tasks relevant to professional development. It is recommended that university educational planners consider these results when designing programmes aimed at enhancing students’ social and cognitive competencies.