Leadership Effectiveness Among Healthcare Managers in Kazakhstan: A Cross-Sectional Study

Samrat Abenov, Aruzhan Montayeva, Anargul Kuntuganova, Jeff Glenn, Kuanysh A. Yergaliyev

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.63946/ehdi/18551
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Background: Leadership effectiveness is a key determinant of organizational performance in healthcare systems. Although leadership styles and emotional intelligence have been widely studied in high-income countries, limited empirical evidence exists within transitional healthcare systems such as Kazakhstan. This study assessed leadership effectiveness among healthcare managers in Kazakhstan and examined associations between leadership effectiveness, leadership styles, and emotional intelligence. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2024 and March 2025 among 77 healthcare managers from medical organizations in Astana and Almaty. Participants were selected using stratified random sampling across managerial levels. Leadership styles were measured using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, emotional intelligence using the Emotional Competency Profiler, and leadership effectiveness using the Management Research Group framework. Reliability and content validity were confirmed. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analysis were performed to examine associations between leadership effectiveness and independent variables. Results: Among the 63 respondents who completed the survey, most reported moderate levels of effectiveness across all dimensions (creating vision, implementing vision, developing followership). Around 62-68% of participants rated their effectiveness as moderate, while approximately 22-33% reported as high. Implementing vision showed the lowest mean score (2.13). Correlation analysis showed that leadership effectiveness was positively associated with transformational (r = 0.45, p = 0.038) and transactional leadership (r = 0.54, p < 0.001), as well as emotional intelligence (r = 0.57, p < 0.001), with emotional intelligence suggesting the strongest relationship. In contrast, no significant association was observed for laissez- faire leadership (r = 0.2617, p = 0.1076). Conclusion: Leadership effectiveness among healthcare managers in Kazakhstan is positively associated with active leadership styles and emotional intelligence. Strengthening competencies related to vision implementation and emotional intelligence may support leadership development within ongoing healthcare reforms. Further research using larger and more diverse samples is warranted.