Institutional Design for Environmental Acts

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1257/pandp.20261066
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Environmental decisions often involve irreversibility and uncertainty. We develop a dynamic model in which actions yield flow benefits, but, once an unknown tipping point is crossed, the accumulated stock of past actions raises the risk of irreversible catastrophe. Because constitutions are incomplete contracts, contingent policies cannot be fully specified, and authority is delegated to decision-makers who observe the current stock but hold biased beliefs, decreasing welfare. Such delegation is thus costly. Imposing caps on early actions can limit discretion and improve welfare, providing foundations for the precautionary principle as a second-best institution.