The impact of instability in Afghanistan on Iran's security strategy, 2021-2025

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31696/s086919080037651-3
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines the impact of Afghanistan’s instability on Iran’s national security strategy during the period 2021 to 2025. The study seeks to identify, classify, and analyze the principal threats and challenges that Iran faces following the Taliban’s return to power. Drawing on the analytical framework of the Copenhagen School of Security Studies, the research adopts a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to explore political, military, socio-economic, and environmental dimensions of regional security. The methodological design integrates qualitative document analysis, expert assessment, scenario-building, and elements of the Delphi method. An exclusive interview with the Iranian Ambassador to Kazakhstan supplies first-hand insights into Tehran’s interpretation of the Afghan crisis and its implications for regional stability and interstate cooperation. The research identifies ten major existential threats, notably terrorism, religious extremism, transnational criminal networks, disputes over shared water resources, uncontrolled migration, and ecological degradation. These interconnected threats illustrate how Afghanistan’s internal instability affects Iran’s domestic security, border governance, economic interests, and foreign policy behavior. The findings demonstrate the adaptive nature of Iran’s strategic response, which combines pragmatic diplomacy, selective security cooperation, humanitarian engagement, and institutional resilience measures. On that basis, the paper proposes concrete policy recommendations to enhance Iran’s resilience to regional volatility, including strengthened border management, institutionalized cooperation on water governance, expanded regional integration mechanisms, and support for multilateral crisis-response platforms. The study contributes empirically to scholarship on regional security dynamics and offers actionable policy insights for state actors, international organizations and humanitarian agencies involved in conflict mitigation and stabilization.