The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Law in Central Asia

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1007/978-3-032-17818-3_6
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract For international legal norms to be effective, they must be reflected and genuinely applied in the domestic law of a state. The main issue discussed in this chapter is two-fold. First, after discussing the Central Asian context, the authors examine the means and methods, more specifically the incorporation (monism) or the transformation (dualism) of international legal norms, that are privileged by one or another Central Asian country in implementing international legal norms, including what this entails and where the choice made for this or that approach comes from, from both a factual and legal perspective. Second, the authors turn their minds to the question of the hierarchical status of international law as provided by Central Asian constitutions. Overall, the implementation of international law is studied in the context in which it is most often used, the integration of human rights law into domestic law, with a focus on the Central Asian context.