Research integrity under publication requirements: a qualitative study of doctoral education in Kazakhstan

International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1007/s40979-026-00219-9
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract This qualitative study aims to examine academic integrity practices in Kazakhstan’s PhD programs following the recent introduction of a publication requirement. By exploring the experiences of doctoral students navigating this requirement and faculty supervising them, the study seeks to identify common academic integrity violations, the factors contributing to misconduct, and the challenges in ensuring ethical research and publication practices. By situating these findings within the unique context of Kazakhstan’s doctoral education, the study reconsiders conventional understandings of misconduct and offers policy recommendations to strengthen academic integrity in similar environments shaped by high-stakes publication requirements.