Advanced Geospatial Data Analytics for Environmental Sustainability to Guide Green Economic Growth

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1145/3789692.3789742
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Green geospatial analytics has become a pivotal enabler in many regional planning frameworks of their sustainability agendas and is regularly appearing as an important aspect of environmental governance and economic development. In the context of spatial decision systems, the rising number of environmental constraints, the growing demand for precision-based indicators, and the necessity to compete on sustainability-driven benchmarks, there is an urgent need for suitable decision-support models. The purpose is to examine how questions of technological adoption, data modeling, and sustainability orientation are made integral parts of these analytical systems. This study aims to investigate the interaction between geospatial intelligence and enterprise-level performance in environmental monitoring, the predictive effect of eco-indicators, and the structural effect of land-use adaptation. The analysis situates the enterprises’ planning strategies in transitional economies, or even emerging contexts, to examine whether the advancement of green growth still relies on a combination of evidence-based modeling and participatory decision-making. AHP, regression is embedded in a TOPSIS–driven evaluation framework in which they play the role of analytical instruments that identify inter-variable associations and forecasting shapes to create decision-ready insights. The results demonstrate (1) that the effect of infrastructure density on sustainability in pilot zones was not statistically significant, while geospatial innovation had a strong positive correlation with growth potential, and land classification had a moderate negative correlation with pollution levels in urban clusters; The study contributes to an understanding of the layered functions and adaptive roles geospatial analytics takes in digital and ecological settings and what it is that these tools find effective in addressing sustainability as a policy-guided transformation.