Accounting and Analytical Support for Cost Controlling in Livestock Production under ESG Constraints: Evidence from European Countries and Kazakhstan

Assets Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pendidikan, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.25273/jap.v15i1.24382
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Livestock production plays a significant role in greenhouse gas emissions, creating increasing pressure to integrate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into cost-controlling and accounting systems. This study examines how governance effectiveness, production scale, and structural characteristics shape livestock emission intensity per head under ESG-related constraints, using a comparative framework covering European Union countries and Kazakhstan. The analysis combines descriptive statistics, three-dimensional visualization, panel regression modeling, and cluster analysis based on country-level panel data for 2000–2023. The results indicate substantial heterogeneity in emission intensity across EU member states and a persistent divergence between the EU median and Kazakhstan. Panel regression findings show that production scale variables dominate the determinants of emission intensity, while governance effectiveness plays a statistically significant but secondary role. Larger herd size is associated with lower emissions per head, suggesting scale-related efficiency gains. Cluster analysis further reveals distinct ESG–emissions groupings, with Kazakhstan positioned outside the main EU clusters. The findings demonstrate that effective ESG integration in livestock cost controlling requires accounting–analytical systems that jointly consider governance conditions, production scale, and structural differences rather than relying on uniform benchmarks or institutional indicators alone.