Review of Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methods for Alzheimer's Disease

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/icecco67619.2026.11488807
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Neural networks demonstrate exceptional efficiency in processing and analyzing big data. In medicine, these advantages open up great opportunities for early diagnosis. However, their implementation is limited by the “black box” problem: doctors cannot trust a diagnosis without understanding the logic of decision-making. To eliminate this barrier, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is used. These methods not only indicate the signs on the basis of which the forecast was made, but can also help identify previously unknown correlations. We systematically screen and then critically analyze recent studies XAI methods applied to Alzheimer's disease screening and diagnosis that integrate machine learning and deep learning models with post-hoc and embedded explainability techniques across multiple data modalities. The review highlights how XAI methods contribute to biomarker identification, model transparency, and clinical trust, while also exposing persistent challenges related to data bias, computational complexity, and limited clinical validation.