The impact of implementation of sex education in schools, and its applicability in Kazakhstan

Frontiers in Global Women s Health, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3389/fgwh.2026.1761178
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Background: In developing countries, including Kazakhstan, formal sex education remains limited due to sociocultural norms, insufficient resources, and the absence of standardized curricula. Objective: This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of school-based comprehensive sex education (CSE) interventions on adolescents' knowledge, attitudes, and sexual behaviors, and assesses their applicability within the Kazakhstani context. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, PMC, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies published up to October 2025. Eligible studies included interventions delivering CSE to children or adolescents and reporting outcomes related to knowledge, attitudes, or sexual behaviors. Primary outcomes included sexual and reproductive health knowledge, sexual behaviors, and biological outcomes (STIs, adolescent pregnancies), secondary outcomes included attitudes toward consent, gender equity, and psychosocial measures. Results: The search did not yield any studies from Kazakhstan or neighboring countries pertaining CSE. However, twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, including eight cluster-randomized controlled trials, two quasi-experimental studies, one cross-sectional study and a longitudinal observational study conducted across multiple countries. Overall, the included studies consistently reported improvements in sexual health knowledge and more favorable attitudes toward safe sexual practices following CSE interventions. A number of studies also indicated positive behavioral trends, such as delayed sexual initiation, increased contraceptive use, and reductions in risky sexual behaviors (e.g., multiple partners and unprotected intercourse), although the magnitude of these effects varied across studies. Conclusions: School-based CSE interventions appear to improve adolescents' knowledge, attitudes, and sexual behaviors in diverse contexts. Factors such as sociocultural might hinder the implementation of CSE in Kazakhstan. However, findings are based on heterogeneous study designs and should be interpreted with caution. At the same time, a culturally sensitive and context specific pilot CSE programs integrated into Kazakhstan's school curriculum, alongside teacher training and supportive health services is warranted.