Advantages and risks of using alternatives to imprisonment

Oñati Socio-legal Series, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.35295/osls.iisl.2502
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study rests on a critical analysis of the key objectives and significance of alternatives to imprisonment at both the international and Kazakh legal levels. The study explores the available evidence on the effectiveness of alternatives to imprisonment. The exploration of this topic is indispensable for the formulation of a comprehensive, ethical, and economically sustainable criminal justice framework that aligns with international norms and takes into account the unique characteristics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Such an endeavor would contribute to the refinement of law enforcement procedures and the overall enhancement of the legal system.