The Identification of Risk Organizations with Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.37965/jait.2026.1249
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

An organizational audit plays a critical role in identifying risk factors, evaluating resource compliance, and supporting informed managerial decision-making. However, traditional audit approaches are increasingly limited by their manual, time-consuming nature and their inability to process complex, multidimensional organizational data efficiently. To address these limitations, this study proposes an intelligent audit risk assessment framework based on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models. The framework is evaluated on a real-world dataset comprising 773 organizational units. A multi-stage methodology is applied, including data preprocessing, normalization, feature selection, class balancing, and model development. A range of ML and DL models, including Naive Bayes, support vector machine, decision tree, random forest (RF), XGBoost, dense neural network (DNN), convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), recurrent and hybrid CNN-LSTM, and LSTM-gated recurrent unit (LSTM-GRU) models, are implemented. The performance is evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Experimental results show that ensemble models, particularly RF and XGBoost, achieve stable, well-generalized performance with test accuracies up to 0.957 and F1-scores up to 0.958, while a DNN and recurrent neural networks demonstrate competitive performance. Overall, the proposed framework demonstrates the strong practical potential of ML and DL models for an organizational audit.