LEXICALISING MYTH AND CULTURAL MEMORY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KAZAKH AND ENGLISH MYTHOLOGEMES

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.55808/1999-4214.2026-1.03
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study investigates mythologemes core mythic concepts encoded in language in Kazakh and English cultures and examines their role in shaping cultural identity. Drawing on linguoculturology and cultural semantics, the research analyzes such figures as “Zhalmauyz Kempir”, “Azireyil”, “the Banshee”, and “the Grim Reaper”. A comparative qualitative design was employed, incorporating data from the British National Corpus, the national corpus of the Kazakh language, literary texts, and folkloric sources. Each mythologeme was examined in its linguistic and cultural context, with particular attention to patterns of lexicalization and metaphorization, and subsequently contrasted across the two languages. The findings demonstrate that although these figures share universal archetypal features primarily as representations of death or evil their linguistic realizations and semantic nuances are culturally specific. For instance, in Kazakh tradition, “Zhalmauyz Kempir” is portrayed as an active, child-devouring entity, whereas the Celtic “Banshee” functions as a passive harbinger of death. Similarly, “Azireyil” in Kazakh discourse evokes the notion of divine fate, while the English “Grim Reaper” embodies the personification of fearful inevitability. Despite cultural differences, both sets of mythologemes remain productive in contemporary language through idioms, metaphors, and media discourse, functioning as dynamic carriers of collective memory and value systems. The study demonstrates that mythologemes operate as adaptable linguistic-cultural constructs that preserve core symbolic meanings while continuously adjusting to evolving social contexts. This comparative analysis highlights how shared mythic motifs are reinterpreted within distinct cultural-linguistic frameworks, thereby reinforcing cultural identity, ethical norms, and national narratives.