Climate-Driven Prediction of Wheat Production in Afghanistan: A Comparative Study of ARIMA, ARIMAX, XGBoost and ANN

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/acdsa67686.2026.11467822
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Prediction of crop production is a challenging task, as it is influenced by various factors such as environmental, technological, and biological factors. In Afghanistan, wheat production is particularly more challenging due to high annual climate volatility like droughts and floods which directly impact yield. A reliable wheat production prediction can help address potential wheat demand accurately. The dataset used in this study includes annual wheat production data from the United States Department of Agriculture and annual climate data from the Climate Change Knowledge Portal for the years 1990 to 2023. After basic cleaning, a correlation and XGBoost-based feature selection was applied. SHAP analysis revealed that extreme climate indices such as maximum number of consecutive wet days (cwd) have a greater influence on production variability than annual mean temperature and precipitation. The selected variables were then used to train and compare Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Model (ARIMA), Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average with Exogenous Variables (ARIMAX), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). The models are evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Eerror (RMSE), and the coefficient of determination$R^{2}$. Our experimental results indicate that XGBoost performs the best, achieving the lowest RMSE, and MAE values, and a higher$R^{2}$score.