The social costs of gambling in Central Asia: insights from Kazakhstan’s addiction crisis

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/02634937.2026.2649958
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Gambling has become a prominent feature of Central Asia's shifting economies, reshaping social life and governance across the region. While some states maintain prohibitions, others, including Kazakhstan, have legalized gambling as a tool for revenue generation and tourism development. This expansion, however, has produced significant social costs, including family disruption, rising indebtedness and declining public trust. This article argues that gambling addiction in Kazakhstan is not merely an individual disorder but a structural vulnerability emerging at the intersection of digital capitalism, welfare retrenchment and contradictory state policies that simultaneously promote and regulate gambling. Drawing on qualitative documentary analysis, policy review and contextual interpretation, the study examines how post-2007 gambling legislation, the confinement of casinos to special zones and the rapid expansion of online and mobile betting platforms have contributed to increasing addiction, household financial distress and governance risks, including corruption and coercion among public officials. Situating Kazakhstan within broader regional and global debates, the article demonstrates how fiscal incentives and regulatory gaps convert economic gains into long-term social and institutional costs. It concludes by emphasizing the need for public health-oriented and coordinated policy responses.