THE EVOLUTION OF STUDENT FEEDBACK LITERACY IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A SCOPING REVIEW (2005 -2025)

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.59787/2413-5488-2025-51-3-185-196
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Feedback literacy is becoming acknowledged as a "foundational capability" students need to self-regulate learning and improve performance at university. This scoping review charts developments in feedback literacy between 2005 and 2025 in terms of conceptualisation, pedagogical interventions, measurement and student-relationed factors, as well as mediators of feedback literacy related to digital technology use in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning contexts. We followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping reviews to search for, select, and screen peer-reviewed empirical studies and conceptual articles published in Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC databases. Thematic analysis was used to synthesise evidence from 43 studies resulting from this search process. The feedback literature is undergoing an ontological paradigm shift, from transmission-to connection-based views of feedback processes. Pedagogical interventions to support students' development of feedback literacy are focused on evaluative judgement through peer-and self-assessment practices and feedforward through curriculum-long approaches to feedback. As learning analytics and Generative AI gain momentum in education, students need critical «AI feedback literacy» to assess machine-generated messages. Students' development of feedback literacy is also contingent on teacher feedback literacy and relational trust. Recommendations for future research include measuring feedback literacy behaviorally and using research designs that triangulate self-report with digital log files when testing students' uptake of feedback.