APPEARANCE, NATURE AND FEATURES OF ACCESSORY JOINTS IN KAZAKH, KYRGYZ LANGUAGES

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.33514/1694-7851-2025-2/1-665-673
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive comparative-typological analysis of case suffixes in the Kazakh and Kyrgyz languages. Despite their historical and genetic kinship and structural similarities, each language exhibits distinct morphological characteristics. The Kazakh language has seven grammatical cases, while the Kyrgyz language employs six. The key difference lies in the absence of the instrumental case as a morphological category in Kyrgyz, where its meaning is expressed analytically through the postposition menen. The study systematically outlines the phonetic-phonological conditions, semantic functions, and differences in synthetic versus analytic expression of case meanings. It also examines case forms in pronouns, substantivized adjectives, and words with plural and possessive suffixes. The Kazakh case system is characterized as more morphologically cohesive and synthetic, while the Kyrgyz language shows a tendency toward analyticism. This research addresses key issues in grammatical typology and the morphological evolution of Turkic languages, highlighting both their shared features and the divergent paths of internal development in each language system.