Scientific and practical basis for implementing machine learning on a parallel computing cluster: a systematic mapping review

Frontiers in Education, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3389/feduc.2026.1741416
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The rapid expansion of machine learning (ML) applications in high-performance computing has motivated extensive research on theoretical models and practical challenges in deploying ML on parallel computing clusters. This PRISMA-guided systematic mapping review synthesized 21 peer-reviewed, open-access studies indexed in IEEE Xplore and published between 2023 and 2024. The review examines distributed optimization frameworks, asynchronous training methods, and hybrid parallelism strategies. It also explores practical issues such as data partitioning, synchronization overhead, and load balancing. Reported performance improvements—including communication time reductions of up to 93.15% and throughput gains of up to 530%—indicate promising advances within the experimental settings and baselines used in the individual studies; these values should not be interpreted as directly comparable or universally generalizable across cluster environments. However, many evaluations were simulation-based and assumed homogeneous hardware, suggesting that real-world scalability requires further validation. Because the evidence base was restricted to one database and a recent two-year publication window, the findings should be interpreted as a bounded map of recent evidence rather than an exhaustive review of the full field.