NOMENCLATURE HISTORY OF PRUNUS ARMENIACA L. AND BOTANICAL STUDIES OF THE SPECIES IN KAZAKHSTAN

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.54596/2958-0048-2026-1-33-44
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the nomenclature history and analysis of the current state of knowledge regarding wild apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) in Kazakhstan. It presents a systematic review of changes in the species’ nomenclature from its original description by C. Linnaeus (1753) to contemporary interpretations in international databases. The study shows that the prolonged use of the name Armeniaca vulgaris Lam. in the Soviet floristic tradition is linked to morphological criteria and historical approaches to Rosaceae systematics, whereas modern molecular-phylogenetic research supports the need to merge the genus Armeniaca with Prunus sensu lato. The review includes a detailed description of the species’ natural range in Kazakhstan, covering the Zailiyskiy Alatau, Dzhungarsky Alatau, Karatau, and Chu-Ili mountains. Ecological conditions, spatial population structure, characteristic habitats, and anthropogenic threats are analyzed. The article also provides an overview of the history of botanical studies of the species in the region, from early floristic research in the 19th century to recent works incorporating molecular-genetic approaches. Knowledge gaps are highlighted, including the lack of comprehensive population-genetic studies, insufficient data on morphometric variability, and the dynamics of natural populations. The analysis lays the foundation for the next research stage, aimed at the bioecological and genetic investigation of wild P. armeniaca populations in southern Kazakhstan.