THE IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE PROCESS OF LEARNING ENGLISH

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52269/srdg2612194
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The relevance of this research stems from the extensive use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in foreign language instruction and from the need for methodologically sound approaches that ensure measurable progress in high school students’ communicative competence. The aim of the study is to identify and evaluate the impact of AI tools on the development of communicative competence in high school students learning English at School No. 117 in Almaty. The research methods include the analysis of scientific and methodological literature, the pedagogical design of a program for integrating AI, a quasi-experiment with control and experimental groups using a pre-post design, observation, diagnostic tasks, and expert assessment of speaking with rubrics (fluency, accuracy, interaction, coherence) on a 0-10 scale, followed by the calculation of an overall index. In the experimental group, students systematically used chatbots for dialogues and role-play situations, speech-to-text applications for self-correction of pronunciation and speech tempo, communicative task generators, and tools providing rapid feedback. Given comparable starting conditions, the overall communicative competence index in the experimental group increased from 5.075 to 6.95 (Δ = 1.875), while in the control group it rose from 5.075 to 5.675 (Δ = 0.6). In the experimental group, the most substantial improvements were observed in interaction and fluency, with noticeable progress also in accuracy and coherence. The study concludes that integrating AI as a source of regular speaking practice and prompt feedback – under specific pedagogical conditions (clear regulations, monitoring of learner autonomy, transparent assessment criteria, and structured reflection) – supports a more effective development of communicative competence in high school students.