Do Investors Respond Differently to Non-GAAP Earnings After Material GAAP Restatements?

Christian Sofilkanitsch

2026

Data confidence 70 medium

How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

SYNOPSIS I investigate whether investors change their responsiveness to non-GAAP earnings following the revelation of past GAAP reporting failures. Using an event-study design, I find that the earnings response coefficient (ERC) for non-GAAP earnings declines by 40.4 percent after the announcement of material GAAP restatements, suggesting that investors view non-GAAP earnings as less informative once the reliability of the underlying GAAP framework is called into question. The decline in non-GAAP ERCs is not explained by changes in delayed investor reactions or non-GAAP-related SEC comment letters. Taken together, the results are consistent with a credibility spillover across mandatory and voluntary reporting frameworks, whereby investors use GAAP signals to infer the credibility of non-GAAP earnings. My findings underscore the interconnectedness of GAAP and non-GAAP reporting and contribute to ongoing debates about the credibility of non-GAAP measures. Data Availability: The data are available from the sources indicated in the text. JEL Classifications: G14; D82; M41.