ЖОҒАРЫ БІЛІМ БЕРУ ЖҮЙЕСІНДЕ АКАДЕМИЯЛЫҚ ДЕРЕКТЕРДІ ҚАУІПСІЗ ВЕРИФИКАЦИЯЛАУҒА АРНАЛҒАН БЛОКЧЕЙН НЕГІЗІНДЕГІ АРХИТЕКТУРАНЫ ӘЗІРЛЕУ ЖӘНЕ МОДЕЛЬДІК АПРОБАЦИЯ

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.70239/arsu.2026.t83.n1.06
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In the context of the digital transformation of higher education, ensuring the authenticity of academic documents, preventing the circulation of fraudulent diplomas, and maintaining data immutability have become critically important. Traditional centralized information systems are characterized by a single point of failure risk and multi-stage administrative verification procedures that increase time and organizational costs. In this regard, the article presents the development of a consortium blockchain-based architecture for secure academic data verification and its model-based validation. During the study, a prototype model was developed using the Ethereum Proof-of-Authority (PoA) network, and diploma registration and verification processes were automated through smart contracts. The proposed architecture follows a hybrid approach, where actual data are stored off-chain, while their cryptographic hashes are recorded on the blockchain. A model-based evaluation was conducted using a synthetic dataset of academic records to analyze the temporal and functional efficiency potential of the verification process. The findings indicate the possibility of optimizing administrative procedures, ensuring data integrity, and enhancing institutional trust. Pilot testing within a real university infrastructure is considered as the next stage of further research.