Features of state control in the media sphere and its influence on the development of regional media

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1386/jdmp_00204_1
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The study aims to analyse the features of state regulation in the information sphere of Kazakhstan and to assess its impact on the development and functioning of regional media. The study identifies key stages in the evolution of national information policy and the mechanisms through which it influences regional media outlets. A sociological survey involving 100 representatives from regional authorities across six regions of Kazakhstan – Akmola, Aktobe, Almaty, Atyrau, Karaganda and Kostanay – helps establish the geographical and structural features of the impact of state policy. In-depth interviews highlight three primary functions of regional media: political communication, cooperation with government bodies and educational outreach. The evaluation results show that the public oversight function received the highest rating (7.9), while educational activity scored the lowest (5.2). The survey further indicates perceptual differences regarding the role of mass media between senior officials and mid-level civil servants, indicating internal differentiation in approaches to information policy. The findings suggest that in the digital age, the information policy of Kazakhstan must strike a balance between information security and freedom of expression. The practical value lies in the potential application of these results for refining information policy amidst ongoing digital transformations.