EMERGING PEACEKEEPING CONTRIBUTORS IN UN MISSIONS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.48371/ismo.2026.63.1.019
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines the participation of emerging states in United Nations peacekeeping missions, with a focus on Kazakhstan in comparative perspective. Using a qualitative comparative approach, the study analyses Kazakhstan alongside Indonesia and South Korea to identify differences in the scale of participation, strategic motivations, and foreign policy objectives. The findings show that while Kazakhstan’s contribution remains limited in scale, it demonstrates a steady upward trend and increasing institutionalization. The comparison reveals that peacekeeping participation serves not only security purposes but also broader diplomatic and strategic goals, including international recognition and foreign policy positioning. The study also identifies key challenges faced by emerging contributors, such as limited resources, institutional coordination, and evolving operational requirements. The article contributes to understanding how emerging states use peacekeeping as a tool of international engagement and security governance.