A PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF NEGATIVE POLITENESS STRATEGIES IN KAZAKH

D. Suleimen, А.Б. Салқынбай

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.59102/kufil/2026/iss1pp182-197
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study presents a pragmatic analysis of negative politeness strategies in the Kazakh language, drawing on Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory as its theoretical framework. Negative politeness refers to communicative strategies designed to minimize imposition, maintain social distance, and respect the interlocutor’s autonomy, collectively known as the preservation of negative face. In Kazakh discourse, these strategies are deeply connected to culturally embedded norms of hierarchy, respect for age and status, and indirectness, all of which are central to regulating interpersonal communication. The primary objective of this research is to identify, classify, and interpret negative politeness strategies as they operate in contemporary Kazakh discourse. The analysis contends that negative politeness in Kazakh extends beyond universal pragmatic patterns, reflecting language-specific realizations shaped by traditional values, social structures, and communicative expectations. Special focus is given to the ways in which speakers mitigate face-threatening acts in contexts such as requests, refusals, advice, and institutional interactions. This research employs a mixed-methods approach, integrating both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Data were sourced from naturally occurring spoken interactions in the Almaty region. The analysis utilizes Brown and Levinson’s classification of negative politeness strategies, including indirectness, hedging, conventional indirect requests, apologizing, minimizing imposition, showing deference, and impersonalizing both speaker and hearer. Each instance is analyzed within its immediate context to elucidate pragmatic functions and sociocultural motivations. The findings indicate that negative politeness strategies in Kazakh are manifested through diverse linguistic devices, such as modal constructions, honorific forms, lexical softeners, formulaic expressions, and syntactic distancing. These strategies are especially prominent in asymmetric communicative situations characterized by differences in age, social status, or institutional roles. The analysis shows that Kazakh speakers often favor indirect and deferential forms of expression to minimize imposition, thereby promoting social harmony and mutual respect.