Structural Transformation of Higher Education in Kazakhstan: Educational, Economic and Social Dimensions

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.47703/2789-8253-2026-1-73-87
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The development of the higher education system is considered one of the key factors in the formation of human capital, the increase in innovation activity, and long-term economic growth. The purpose of the article is to analyse the structural transformation of of Kazakhstan’s higher education system by identifying interrelations among educational, economic, and social indicators for 2004-2024. The methodological basis of the study consists of correlation analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) with Varimax orthogonal rotation, which enables the identification of hidden structural factors and the assessment of the consistency of indicator dynamics. The empirical basis of the study was made up of annual statistical data from the Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2004-2024, including such indicators as the number of students and teachers, the number of universities, the unemployment rate, household incomes, spending on science, innovation activity, the Gini index, the share of education spending in GDP and average wages. The results reveal strong structural relationships between economic development and science financing (r = 0.986) and between income and wages (r = 0.985). Principal component analysis shows that the first component explains 73.6% of the variance. In comparison, the first two components explain 88.9% of the variance, indicating a structural transformation of higher education associated with the development of the knowledge economy. Future research may extend the analysis by incorporating regional data, panel econometric models, and additional institutional indicators to assess causal relationships between higher education development, labour market outcomes, and innovation dynamics.