Secondary Education Financing in Kazakhstan: Challenges and Efficiency

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.47703/2789-8253-2026-1-119-136
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In the context of the transition to a knowledge economy and the increasing demands on the quality of human capital, the effectiveness of financing secondary education is becoming particularly relevant. The aim of the study is to assess the impact of financing mechanisms for secondary education on the quality of educational outcomes in Kazakhstan, considering infrastructural, human, and digital factors. The methodological basis of the research includes methods of descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, econometric modeling, and performance analysis. The empirical database is based on panel data for 17 regions of Kazakhstan for the period 2015–2025. The results of the study revealed a stable positive relationship between financing and the quality of education. Digitalization (β = 3.45) and infrastructure (β = 2.63) had the greatest impact, whereas the impact of financial expenses was more moderate (β = 1.92). The burden on teachers has a statistically significant negative impact (β = −1.08). The high coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.84) confirms the model’s significant explanatory power. The results of the DEA analysis demonstrate pronounced regional differentiation in efficiency, with Almaty (0.92) and Astana (0.90) occupying the leading positions, while the southern and western regions exhibit lower efficiency. The results show that financing is a necessary but insufficient condition for improving the quality of education. The research contributes to the development of the theory of educational financing by demonstrating the need to transition to an integrated resource management model focused on the effectiveness and quality of educational outcomes.