THE MEANING AND LEGAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LEGAL POSITIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52026/2788-5291_2026_81_1_39
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive examination of the essence, legal nature, mechanisms of formation, and the role of the legal positions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan within the legal system. The legal positions of the Supreme Court are characterized as a significant legal phenomenon that ensures the uniformity of judicial practice through the application and interpretation of legal norms. The author highlights the main features of legal positions: normative foundation, binding force, universal applicability, stability, and their supplementary nature to normative acts. The study employs legal, theoretical-legal, and comparative methods, analyzing the practices of the courts of Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation in a comparative context. The classification and types of legal positions are discussed, along with their manifestations in judicial decisions, normative resolutions, information letters, and judges’ dissenting opinions. The article also explores the role of legal positions in doctrinal, law-making, and law enforcement spheres. Emphasis is placed on the importance of legal positions not only as tools of law enforcement but also as mechanisms for systematizing legal ideas and improving legislation. The author analyzes the logical, linguistic, and philosophical aspects of legal positions, substantiating their impact on legal decision-making. It is emphasized that the systematization and development of the Supreme Court’s legal positions make a significant contribution to improving the quality of judicial practice and strengthening the rule of law. The article is highly relevant for both academic research and legal practice. Therefore, the materials presented offer valuable insights for understanding the internal logic of the national legal system, ensuring legal justice, enhancing judicial practice, and contributing to the development of legal theory.