The Linguistic Representation of Traditions and Customs in the Works of M. Auezov and W. Shakespeare: a Comparative Analysis

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/ejph201120263
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article presents a comparative cultural-linguistic analysis of the representation of traditions and ritual discourse in Mukhtar Auezov’s epic novel The Path of Abai and selected plays by William Shakespeare (Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet, Macbeth, The Merchant of Venice, and Twelfth Night). The study explores how ritual language functions as a mechanism for encoding national worldview, social hierarchy, and moral values within Kazakh and English literary traditions. Drawing on ethnolinguistic analysis, speech act theory, discourse-pragmatic methodology, and cultural linguistics, the research examines 45 textual fragments that illustrate ritualized speech acts such as blessings, oaths, lamentations, curses, wedding formulas, and honor-related expressions. The findings demonstrate that ritual language in both corpora operates as a performative system that regulates social relations and legitimizes authority. In Auezov’s narrative, ritual discourse is grounded in oral-poetic tradition, ethnographic terminology, and communal forms of speech, reflecting collective cultural consciousness. In Shakespeare’s works, ritual language is shaped by liturgical, legal, and rhetorical conventions of the Elizabethan era, emphasizing institutional authority and individual moral responsibility. Despite cultural differences, both authors employ ritual speech as a structural and semantic device that transforms personal experience into socially validated action. The study contributes to contemporary cultural linguistics by proposing a comparative pragmatic framework for analyzing ritual discourse across civilizations. It demonstrates that literary language serves not only as an artistic medium but also as a repository of collective memory and a carrier of cultural identity. Keywords: ritual discourse, ethnolinguistics, cultural linguistics, performativity, Auezov, Shakespeare, national worldview, speech acts.