THE PARADOX OF NATIVE ADVERTISING PERCEPTION: NEUROMARKETING ASSESSMENT OF INFLUENCER INTEGRATIONS IN ADVERTISING CREATIVES

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.63881/ejent2026v2i1a3
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study investigates the paradox of native advertising perception in influencer integrations. A mixed-methods neuromarketing design was employed: FaceReader facial emotion recognition data were triangulated with post-viewing survey results. Four influencer videos from a Kazakh influencer agency served as stimuli — two native and two aggressive format (N = 11). The findings demonstrate that the key driver of emotional response is not the native vs. aggressive dichotomy, but the product reveal moment and the degree of product-influencer fit. A systematic engagement–interest gap was identified: viewers engage with content but do not develop product interest. A divergence between involuntary facial reactions and conscious self-assessment was discovered, explained through the Persuasion Knowledge Model. A conceptual model of influencer integration perception is proposed, integrating perception theory, PKM, and cognitive dissonance. The results have practical implications for optimizing creative processes at influencer agencies.