PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF ENDOSCOPIC HEMOSTASIS FAILURE IN ULCERATIVE BLEEDING

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.35805/bsk2026i001
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This case is unique because it demonstrates the simultaneous presence of multiple major predictors of endoscopic hemostasis failure in a single patient with ulcerative bleeding, clearly illustrating their cumulative and clinically decisive impact. A 75-year-old patient was admitted with massive duodenal bleeding complicated by hemorrhagic shock, severe anemia, renal dysfunction, and coagulopathy associated with warfarin therapy. Endoscopy revealed a large posterior duodenal ulcer with active spurting arterial bleeding corresponding to Forrest Ia classification. Combined endoscopic hemostasis was initially achieved; however, early recurrent bleeding developed within six hours. Repeat endoscopic intervention was technically unsuccessful due to deep crater morphology and anatomical location adjacent to a major arterial branch. Definitive hemostasis was obtained through selective angiography and endovascular embolization of a branch of the gastroduodenal artery. This case highlights the critical importance of cumulative risk assessment and supports early multidisciplinary decision-making with timely transition to endovascular management in patients presenting with multiple high-risk features.