The penal enforcement legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan and other measures of criminal legal impact

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.46914/2959-4197-2026-1-1-192-203
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines the regulatory framework of Kazakh legislation establishing other measures of criminal law coercion alongside punishment. These measures are normatively закреплены in penitentiary legislation and the current Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The authors conduct a legal analysis of this institution, consider doctrinal approaches, and formulate their understanding of the legal nature and essence of coercive criminal law measures. The study concludes that the existing system of other criminal law measures does not fully correspond to their legal nature and purposes, necessitating improvement of legislative regulation. Particular attention is paid to the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan of January 10, 2018 “On the Victims Compensation Fund,” which influenced the transformation of the final section of the General Part of the Criminal Code, including Articles 98-1 and 98-2 regulating compulsory payments. The authors argue that this mechanism contains elements of double criminal liability, contradicts constitutional prohibitions on repeated coercive measures, and presents problems in practical implementation.