Students’ Multilingual Practices in the English Classroom in Kazakhstan

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.17507/tpls.1603.35
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study seeks to contribute to the ongoing discussions of multilingualism in the English classroom and intends to explore forms of multilingualism in a formal classroom context, being the first effort to document Kazakh students’ authentic interactions involving Kazakh, Russian and English in the English classroom. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study investigates the use of languages and types of multilingualism in students’ group discussions, supported by quantitative and qualitative data from a sociolinguistic survey. The results reveal a dynamic and integrated use of English, Russian and Kazakh during formal student discussions, with English being dominant and Russian and Kazakh making significant contributions. Kazakh students are shown to engage in diverse multilingual behaviors, including various forms of code-switching (intra-sentential, extra-sentential, intra-word) serving different functions (such as reference, discourse markers and structural roles). Survey results indicate harmonious interaction among the three languages and frequent multilingual usage, underscoring the fluid and integrated language practices in Kazakhstan’s educational settings. Although opinions vary on whether students should adhere to using a single language in certain contexts, the common practice and positive view of employing multiple languages is recognized. These findings highlight students’ flexible multilingual competence, which supports adaptable communication shaped by context. The study offers valuable empirical evidence for language policy, teaching methods and sociolinguistic theory in multilingual post-Soviet environments.