254P Effectiveness of a fast-track (ERAS) rehabilitation program after lung cancer surgery: A prospective randomized study

ESMO Open, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.106562
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs aim to reduce postoperative complications and accelerate recovery. Evidence supporting ERAS in thoracic oncology remains limited. This prospective randomized study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of a Fast-Track rehabilitation protocol compared with conventional postoperative management in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery.