A Model for Implementing Health-Preserving Technologies in Innovative Methods of Teaching Language and Literature

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.33619/2414-2948/124/74
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Amid digital overload and rising anxiety, this article argues for integrating health-preserving technologies into language and literature teaching. We detail kinesiology, breathing exercises, rhythmoplastics, art-therapy practices, gamification, multimodal learning, and shadow reading. A pedagogical model—“Smart Word & Living Movement”—combines cognitive work with gentle motor and respiratory activity. The methodological frame draws on health-promoting pedagogy, Universal Design for Learning, and WHO/UNESCO Health-Promoting Schools standards. Expected effects include higher motivation and attention, reduced fatigue and anxiety, better reading fluency and textual interpretation, and stronger vocal stamina. School pilots show practical feasibility: two to three micro-breaks of 60–90 seconds, short role-plays, and 4-4-4-4 box breathing. Effectiveness is monitored via engagement rates, VAS-fatigue, words-per-minute, and mood ratings across classes and grade levels.