Sensitivity of Dermatophytes to Terbinafine: World Experience and Recent Findings from Kazakhstan

Antibiotics, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/antibiotics15030266
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This article describes the results of an analysis of the sensitivity of dermatophytosis pathogens to terbinafine, conducted by the authors based on a review of available scientific publications and data from their own research. Currently, no information is available on the sensitivity of Kazakh isolates obtained from patients at dermatological clinics. The aim of this study was to compile data on the resistance of dermatophytes to terbinafine over the past decade worldwide and investigate the sensitivity of dermatophyte isolates collected from patients in Astana, Kazakhstan, to terbinafine. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, utilizing the Pubmed and Cochrane Library databases with specific keywords. The sensitivity of the dermatophytes to terbinafine was assessed using EUCAST E.Def 11.0 method. Results: Screening of terbinafine susceptibility among Kazakh clinical isolates revealed that all Microsporum canis strains (57/57, 100%) were sensitive to the drug. Among 33 Trichophyton spp. isolates, 4 (12.1%) demonstrated resistance to terbinafine, with MIC values ranging from 0.125 to 1.5 µg/mL. The resistant isolates belonged to the species T. indotineae, T. interdigitale, and T. mentagrophytes. Conclusions: Terbinafine remains highly effective against Microsporum canis in Kazakhstan, while a small proportion of Trichophyton isolates show resistance. Continuous monitoring of dermatophyte susceptibility is warranted to guide effective treatment.