Implementation of the 1992 Helsinki Convention in Transboundary Groundwater Management: A Comparative Analysis with the Case of the Shu Basin

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51301/ejsu.2026.i1.06
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In the context of increasing freshwater scarcity and climate change, effective transboundary water management, including groundwater resources, is particularly important. The 1992 Helsinki Convention provides an international legal basis for states to cooperate to protect and rationally use transboundary watercourses and aquifers. This article is aimed at a comparative analysis of the practice of implementing the provisions of the Convention in different regions of the world - Europe, Central Asia and Africa - with an emphasis on hydrogeological aspects. Particular attention is paid to the Shuya transboundary basin, located on the territory of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, as a case of partial implementation of international standards. Based on a systemic analysis of groundwater management, monitoring, and protection practices, recommendations are proposed to integrate the Convention's provisions into regional water policies and institutional mechanisms. The study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the practice of applying the 1992 Helsinki Convention in various regions of the world, with an emphasis on transboundary groundwater, highlighting the problems and prospects of its implementation using the example of the Shuya basin. The study confirmed that the application of the 1992 Helsinki Convention varies significantly across geographical and political-institutional contexts.